Skip to main content
Don’t miss our
best deal ever
offer ends july 23
save over $160
6 months
Don’t miss our
best deal ever
for 6 months
save over $160
Start Today
// //
Log in
Globe Shop

Reader services

  • Subscriptions
  • Settings
  • Customer Help
  • Log in
  • Log out

Getting audio file ...

Audio for this article is not available at this time.

This translation has been automatically generated and has not been verified for accuracy. Full Disclaimer

Ontario Power Generation signage is seen facility at the Darlington Power Complex, in Bowmanville, Ont., on May 31, 2019.

The Canadian Press

Ontario Power Generation plans to achieve carbon neutrality by 2040, joining a small but growing number of utilities across North America that have made formal commitments.

OPG will announce on Thursday morning its intention to reach “net zero” carbon emissions by reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions from generation facilities, as well as through other measures such as purchasing offsets. Several initiatives are already under way that will help achieve the target, including refurbishment and upgrades to existing facilities. OPG also plans to adopt emerging, unproven technologies, under the assumption they will become feasible and cost-effective in the years ahead.

“The way forward won’t always be clear,” CEO Ken Hartwick acknowledged in a statement. “But we won’t let that lack of perfect clarity stop us from taking action now.”

Story continues below advertisement

Xcel Energy, a major U.S. utility active in eight states, was credited as being the first in North America to pledge carbon neutrality two years ago. Relatively few Canadian utilities have followed suit. Hydro-Québec has declared it would become carbon neutral by 2030; SaskPower said it was considering how it might achieve zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, but has yet to make a commitment. BC Hydro said it’s been carbon neutral since 2010.

Achieving net-zero would be more difficult for utilities in Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia that still rely heavily on coal. In contrast, OPG’s fleet is already dominated by two low-emission generation technologies: nuclear and hydroelectric. It shuttered the last of its coal-fired power plants in 2014.

Since then, OPG’s performance on reducing emissions has stagnated. OPG reported emitting just more than 500,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent last year. (Nova Scotia Power released 13 times that amount while generating far less electricity for a much smaller province.)

OPG’s major initiatives include continuing reactor refurbishments at Darlington Nuclear Generating Station. It will also upgrade hydro facilities, including replacing two obsolete turbine generators at the century-old Sir Adam Beck station at Niagara Falls. The new units are much more efficient, and will add about 125 megawatts in new generating capacity.

Some of its plans are more speculative. Earlier this month, the utility announced plans to build a new nuclear reactor at the Darlington plant as early as 2028. It would be Canada’s first small modular reactor (SMR) for power generation, and the first new reactor in Canada in decades. OPG says it will select a builder by the end of next year.

In the meantime, however, the looming closing of the aging Pickering Nuclear Generating Station may force OPG to rely more on fossil fuels. In April, it controversially finalized the purchase of natural gas-fired plants from TC Energy and rolled them into a new subsidiary, Atura Power.

That drew fire from environmental groups. The Ontario Clean Energy Alliance said the province will see a four-fold increase in greenhouse gas emissions between now and 2040. OPG said it might invest in carbon capture and storage, a technology used to sequester emissions underground.

Story continues below advertisement

Government actions are likely to compel more utilities to pursue net-zero targets. U.S. president-elect Joe Biden campaigned on a promise to achieve net-zero emission for the entire U.S. power sector by 2035 – a more ambitious objective than the one set by Canada’s federal government, which has committed to achieving a similar target 15 years later.

Binnu Jeyakumar, director of the clean energy program at the Pembina Institute, an energy think tank, said utilities are also adopting net-zero commitments because renewable generation, demand-management and other clean options are cheaper than new natural gas plants. Tightening carbon pricing schemes should make natural gas plants even less economically attractive in the years ahead. And net-zero commitments play well with many institutional investors.

“We’ve definitely seen a growing interest in investors to be compliant with the Paris agreement, which means a 1.5-degree world,” she said.

The United Nations Environment Programme has said that in order to limit an increase in the global average temperatures to 1.5 C – beyond which a host of grave impacts such intensifying droughts, storms and sea-level rise are expected – global emissions must fall 7.6 per cent each year between now and 2030.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Read more about following topics and s

Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Facebook and Twitter .

Log in Subscribe to comment Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Facebook and Twitter .

I'm a print subscriber, link to my account Subscribe to comment Why do I need to subscribe?

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Read most recent letters to the editor.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies